I\O ERROR |
I\O ERROR |
Oct 11 2007, 06:18 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Train Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 148 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Leominster, MA United States Member No.: 29 |
Steve / Norman
When running AG on an updated template i'm working on when I compile the activity everything goes fine until the end and I get an I\O error. My question is what should I be looking for in the files that may cause this problem? Thanks, Peter -------------------- Peter
Arcadia Terminal Street & Dock Railroad |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 15 2007, 07:15 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Train Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 148 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Leominster, MA United States Member No.: 29 |
Everyone,
Thank you for your input. Yes this route does have problems with duplicate track numbers that is why I use locations the SWLACT generates to verify the tracks on the SWLTDB. When I generate the final template I edit all the duplicate track numbers and add a discription IE: 1 YD S. Oak, 1 YD Weehawken Ect. I also have compiled a master list for this route with all the sidings, railroads Ect. to check for duplicate numbers in the SWLTDB. The problem is not with the duplicate track numbers as I can usualy ID the railroad / location from my seed list, the problem is numbers that don't match ANY number that is generated. On other templates just changing the ID number up or down one digit so they would match the SWLACT worked, they also worked in this template. Back th the reason I regenerated the two data bases, When doing my final runs on all the sidings prior to releasing this template I started getting I/O errors and could not find a problem in the Debug data. My thought was the problem may be the adjusted location numbers so I regenerated the data in AG4.2 The new question is did I open up a new bag of worms and the adjusted numbers are OK? Could the problem be related tho other factors in the template? Steve, if I get a chance tonight I will send you the files that started this thread not the current ones that may mask the real probem. Please post you findings as we all may learn from this and it will be help for all in the future. Thanks, Peter -------------------- Peter
Arcadia Terminal Street & Dock Railroad |
|
|
|
AT RR I\O ERROR Oct 11 2007, 06:18 AM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 11 2007, 07:18 AM) Stev... Oct 11 2007, 11:12 AM
AT RR QUOTE(sgdavis @ Oct 11 2007, 11:12 AM) Wh... Oct 11 2007, 01:48 PM
AT RR Steve,
Still no luck, the debug reports look clean... Oct 12 2007, 06:30 AM
AT RR Steve,
I'm ready to call it quits on this temp... Oct 13 2007, 08:28 AM
nbeveridge QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 13 2007, 08:28 AM) Stev... Oct 13 2007, 11:48 AM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 13 2007, 09:28 AM) Stev... Oct 14 2007, 08:43 AM
jrmeindl Steve and Peter,
Just wondering if this problem c... Oct 13 2007, 11:55 AM
jrmeindl I didn't realize this route was renamed along ... Oct 13 2007, 02:22 PM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 15 2007, 08:15 AM) Ever... Oct 16 2007, 06:06 PM
AT RR Steve,
Thank you for the help. Is their a forum ou... Oct 17 2007, 06:16 AM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 17 2007, 07:16 AM) Stev... Oct 17 2007, 06:42 AM
AT RR QUOTE(sgdavis @ Oct 17 2007, 06:42 AM) Pe... Oct 17 2007, 08:14 AM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 17 2007, 09:14 AM) Stev... Oct 17 2007, 10:31 AM
AT RR QUOTE(sgdavis @ Oct 17 2007, 10:31 AM) Pe... Oct 18 2007, 08:00 AM
sgdavis QUOTE(AT RR @ Oct 18 2007, 09:00 AM) Stev... Oct 18 2007, 06:21 PM
sgdavis QUOTE(sgdavis @ Oct 18 2007, 07:21 PM) Th... Oct 20 2007, 09:34 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th December 2025 - 11:23 PM |